Validity of an Ocular Emergency Triage System Compared to the Existing Grading System at the Emergency Unit of a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Purpose: To assess true ocular emergencies based on the ocular emergency triage system compared to the existing method of serving patients "first come first serve" by attending ophthalmology resident and review the validity of the triage system by ophthalmic subspecialty. Methods: In this cross-sectional study of validity, new patients attending the ocular emergency department of a tertiary eye hospital in 2021-2022 were examined by ophthalmology resident. The time required for registration, an eye exam, and total time in the emergency unit was determined. Using ophthalmic triage criteria, same patients were reviewed by senior ophthalmologist to categorize them as "top emergencies", "emergencies", and "not an emergency." The reviewer was masked about grading by an ophthalmology resident. The agreement rate for true emergencies by both methods of grading was calculated by subspecialty. Results: One thousand patients with ocular emergencies were evaluated. The median overall time spent in the emergency unit was 92 minutes [interquartile range (IQR): 56; 142]. The revised triage system estimated 85% were "true emergencies." Using both the revised triage and conventional methods, 172 (17.2%) patients were not considered as having an ocular emergency. The difference in patients grouped into "emergencies" (34.3% vs 21.4%) and "top emergencies" (46.5% vs 60.4%) was significant (P<0.001) between methods. Uveitis (72%) had the lowest agreement between methods and pediatric ophthalmology (100%) had the highest agreement. Conclusion: The revised ophthalmic triage system seems to be more efficient than existing method. Subspecialist ophthalmologists may provide quicker and better treatment if ophthalmic emergency patients are prioritized utilizing the proposed redesigned triage method.

Acute unilateral vision loss and bilateral cerebral infarction following cosmetic filler injection.

The current case report describes acute unilateral vision loss and bilateral cerebral infarction as devastating complications following cosmetic injection of hyaluronic acid to the nasal bridge in a 34-year-old female. The patient reported the onset of sudden eye pain, headache, and vision loss in her right eye. At the initial visit to the hospital, the patient had no light perception in the right eye. Examinations revealed marked ptosis and complete ophthalmoplegia with no proptosis. At the time of the patient's hospital evaluation, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were ordered. Few mottled materials (denser than blood) were observed in the cavernous sinus with a density of 106 Hounsfield units (HU), yet no air was depicted in the cavernous sinus. MRI scan revealed multiple areas of bilateral intracranial infarcts. Although cosmetic injection of hyaluronic acid has been documented as a safe procedure, vision loss remains one of the most feared complications.

Pitfalls of Advanced Retinopathy of Prematurity Presentation: A Content Analysis of Medical Records.

PURPOSE: To identify the pitfalls in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening leading to advanced disease at Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A qualitative deductive content analysis was used to study the phenomena of defects in ROP screening. A retrospective review of medical records of newborns presenting to two tertiary eye care centers with advanced ROP (stage 4 and 5) from January 2012 to June 2019 was completed. An extensive review of the original files at the referring hospitals was conducted, including the general condition and findings of ophthalmic examination and the sequence of follow-up until the infant was discharged/referred. Data analysis was completed using pre-structured categorization matrix. RESULTS: Records of 29 infants with advanced stage ROP were identified. Only 13 medical records were available and obtained. The pitfalls in screening found in the study were failure to refer by the neonatologist, delayed follow-up by the ophthalmologist, failure to follow-up by the ophthalmologist, failure to diagnose by the ophthalmologist, poor documentation in patient files, unavailability of ophthalmologist, family negligence, lack of treatment and delayed referral to a higher center, and progression despite timely screening and management. CONCLUSION: Although clear ROP screening guidelines are available, implementations of these guidelines are suboptimal. This study showed that the most common defect in screening is physician's inadequacy and unavailability. A proper network of competent ROP screening physicians in all neonatal intensive care units should be established. Centers for advanced ROP surgery should be allocated to deliver a timely surgical care if needed.

Persistent subretinal fluid following diabetic tractional retinal detachment repair: risk factors, natural history, and management outcomes.

PURPOSE: To study the natural history, anatomical and functional outcomes of persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) and combined traction-rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (TRRD). METHODS: Retrospective interventional case series of 43 patients (46 eyes) with persistent SRF following PPV for diabetic TRD or combined TRRD from January 2010 to December 2017 at single tertiary institution. Primary outcomes included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT). RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes (67.4%) had macula-off TRD, 5 (10.9%) had fovea-threatening TRD and 10 (21.7%) had combined TRRD. The mean (± SD) duration of decreased vision was 48.0 ± 58.2 weeks. The mean follow-up duration was 21 ± 13.2 months. Residual macular SRF was detected by optical coherence tomography in all eyes at 3 months and in 10 eyes (23.8%) at 12 months after surgery. Only 3 eyes (6.5%) had persistent SRF at final follow up. The mean time to resolution was 10.6 ± 4.1 months [range 6.0-23.0]. Thirteen eyes received additional intervention to address SRF. The mean CFT gradually improved until final follow-up (P-value < 0.001). The mean BCVA improved from 1.62 ± 0.88 LogMAR at presentation to 1.05 ± 0.76 LogMAR at final follow up. No statistically significant difference in final BCVA was found between eyes that had intervention and eyes that were observed (P value = 0.762). CONCLUSION: Persistent SRF after diabetic vitrectomy resolves slowly over time with gradual improvement in visual acuity. Additional drainage of persistent SRF may not be necessary.

Streptococcus agalactiae Endophthalmitis in Boston Keratoprosthesis in a Patient with Steven-Johnson Syndrome.

A 25-year-old Syrian male with a previous episode of Stevens-Johnson syndrome with bilateral corneal cicatrization previously underwent surgery for Type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis (K-Pro). Sixteen months after the K-Pro surgery, the patient presented with decreased vision to hand motion and microbial keratitis of the graft around the K-Pro with purulent discharge. Corneal scrapings were nonrevealing. B-scan in 3 days showed increased debris in the vitreous cavity and thickened retinochoroidal layer. Intravitreal tap and injections of vancomycin and ceftazidime were performed. The vitreous culture revealed ß-hemolytic Streptococcus agalactiae; fungal cultures were negative. Repeat B-scan 3 days later demonstrated decreased vitreous opacity, and the patient felt more comfortable and was without pain. His visual acuity improved to 20/70, ocular findings have been stable for 9 months, and the patient continues to be monitored.